Yes, that's Yonaguni!
Some professor marine geologists, archaelogists and
mathematicians dated it back as twice earlier the Great Pyramids of Egypt
or even much earlier prior to the end of last ice
age.
>
> Graham Hancock is just the last of a long line of
such
> earlier "researchers". Unfortunately, despite their
claims, in every
> case, eventually they are shown to be based upon
faulty evidence. I
> myself was, at the age of 13, going to write
"the definitive book"
> about Atlantis and did a great deal of
research, before discovering
> how the theories of the esoteric school
are built on sand. For a
> real understanding of this phenomenon,
read Robert Anton
> Wilson's "Illuminatus Trilogy".
>
>
Quite a revelation!
>
> Regards
>
>
John
Yonaguni-like finds certainly mean that building
great monuments requires a deep knowledge of mathematics and
writing, (perhaps even astronomy and more...)
And that, such power of
knowledge should had been in the hands of a lost and not yet
known civilization. This was the point of my previous message.
Just suppose it is not natural but manmade
and (at least) 12.000 years old dating by some
scientists is correct. Now, is it really not logical
to question the established civilization history, which is full of
unknowns and contradictions, with a probable existance of a far
older intelligent and sophisticated
civilization?
BTW, all I meant by saying "esoteric" was
an antonym of "skin-deep look/view". And sorry, but don't have
much to say about the rest..;)
Regards,
Kamil