--- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jdcroft@...> wrote:

> Dear Slawomir
>
> Yes, calculating the phase space of adunamentum creates a perfectly
> large sert of possibilities. The question is, how many of them
> actually make sense (not in foreign languages) but in Latin, the
> language of which the word was originally composed? And without
> needing to anagramatise or eliminate and superimpose wholly new
> vowels and other "sleight of hand" linguistic tricks. This has the
> prospect of reducing the permutations and combinations enormously --

-

> to one

Hi Jihn!

Could you explain, to me and world, what mean each
*ad
una
mentum

and whay it together mean

adunamentum

(as i remember something ith wind)


Regards
_.._

> *ad-una-mentum.
>
> Regards
>
> John
>
> > isnt it show that word A is a comosition of words B
> > A> > adunamentum
> > B> > a duna men tu
> > C> > a du na men tu
> >
> > Mathematicaly
> > it is a set of elemnts with order.
> > The logic value of A & B are the same
> > perhaps if we cat add value to other word list
> > eg Latin it could ne proved that latin is the
> > Source.
> > But WhY add a priori a prefered value? cut(*1)
> >
> > is it a brain limit? i think 0.4
> > is it a politics ? i think 0.2
> > is it a fashion ? i think 0.8
> > Is it a right ? i think 0
> >
> > Regards
> > Slawomir
> >
> >
> >
> > results
> >
> > D
> > ad una mentu 59
> > adu na mentu 31
> > adun a mentu 24
> >
> > also
> > E
> > aduna m entu 14
> > aduna men tu 96
> > aduna ment u 36
> >
> > F
> > G in D ignore mantu
> > H in F Ignore aduna
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > and
> > I not ignore John as viceversa
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com, "H.M. Hubey" <hubeyh@...>

wrote:

> > > There is no reason why Latin adun- and Turkic utan cannot be
> > related. It
> > > also shows
> > > up in Turkic as uyal, and ayIp (shameful). Using the usual
> dh>y,d,
> > t
> > > there is no reason
> > > why they cannot be genetically linked.
> > >
> > > But anagrams are a different story.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Similarly the root Kaya uses et (to do) shows up as ep
> (akkadian),
> > tu
> > > (Chuvash) and
> > > of course, "do" English. Again there is no reason why some

words

> > could
> > > not have been
> > > created from a stem/root+do/make. It shows up in Turkic e.g,
> kork
> > (to
> > > fear), korkut (scare,
> > > eg. cause to fear).
> > >
> > > slawomirmiroslawski wrote:
> > >
> > > > --- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com, "slawomirmiroslawski"
> > > > <slawomirmiroslawski@...> wrote:
> > > > > Using the word list from ixlop i my soft arange:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > the arngament take some time, but this is under construction

sof

> > > >
> > > > > a stream of some kind of liquid or gas coming in speaker
> > direction
> > > > > a stream of some kind "anything" coming in speaker
> > direction
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > > > click here
> > > >
> >
>

<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=259538.3625325.4914071.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17

> >

05739206:HM/A=1695348/R=0/SIG=11u38u3s2/*http://hits.411web.com/cgi-

> > bin/hit?page=1374-105951838331032>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > > Nostratica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> > Service
> > > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mark Hubey
> > > hubeyh@...
> > > http://www.csam.montclair.edu/~hubey
> >
> > ad--1
> > Whay look at a set of sets when i showing simpler set.
> >
> > Why some words sets may be prefered
> > And other just ignored?
> >
> > Du the linguist just like
> > Some languages ?
> >
> > Or do they use only a limited set du tu human capacity?