Dear Slawomir

Yes, calculating the phase space of adunamentum creates a perfectly
large sert of possibilities. The question is, how many of them
actually make sense (not in foreign languages) but in Latin, the
language of which the word was originally composed? And without
needing to anagramatise or eliminate and superimpose wholly new
vowels and other "sleight of hand" linguistic tricks. This has the
prospect of reducing the permutations and combinations enormously ---
to one

*ad-una-mentum.

Regards

John

> isnt it show that word A is a comosition of words B
> A> > adunamentum
> B> > a duna men tu
> C> > a du na men tu
>
> Mathematicaly
> it is a set of elemnts with order.
> The logic value of A & B are the same
> perhaps if we cat add value to other word list
> eg Latin it could ne proved that latin is the
> Source.
> But WhY add a priori a prefered value? cut(*1)
>
> is it a brain limit? i think 0.4
> is it a politics ? i think 0.2
> is it a fashion ? i think 0.8
> Is it a right ? i think 0
>
> Regards
> Slawomir
>
>
>
> results
>
> D
> ad una mentu 59
> adu na mentu 31
> adun a mentu 24
>
> also
> E
> aduna m entu 14
> aduna men tu 96
> aduna ment u 36
>
> F
> G in D ignore mantu
> H in F Ignore aduna
>
>
>
>
> and
> I ignore John as viceversa
>
>
>
> --- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com, "H.M. Hubey" <hubeyh@...> wrote:
> > There is no reason why Latin adun- and Turkic utan cannot be
> related. It
> > also shows
> > up in Turkic as uyal, and ayIp (shameful). Using the usual

dh>y,d,

> t
> > there is no reason
> > why they cannot be genetically linked.
> >
> > But anagrams are a different story.
>
>
>
>
> >
> > Similarly the root Kaya uses et (to do) shows up as ep

(akkadian),

> tu
> > (Chuvash) and
> > of course, "do" English. Again there is no reason why some words
> could
> > not have been
> > created from a stem/root+do/make. It shows up in Turkic e.g,

kork

> (to
> > fear), korkut (scare,
> > eg. cause to fear).
> >
> > slawomirmiroslawski wrote:
> >
> > > --- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com, "slawomirmiroslawski"
> > > <slawomirmiroslawski@...> wrote:
> > > > Using the word list from ixlop i my soft arange:
> > > >
> > >
> > > the arngament take some time, but this is under construction sof
> > >
> > > > a stream of some kind of liquid or gas coming in speaker
> direction
> > > > a stream of some kind "anything" coming in speaker
> direction
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> > > ADVERTISEMENT
> > > click here
> > >
>

<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=259538.3625325.4914071.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17

> 05739206:HM/A=1695348/R=0/SIG=11u38u3s2/*http://hits.411web.com/cgi-
> bin/hit?page=1374-105951838331032>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > > Nostratica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service
> > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mark Hubey
> > hubeyh@...
> > http://www.csam.montclair.edu/~hubey
>
> ad--1
> Whay look at a set of sets when i showing simpler set.
>
> Why some words sets may be prefered
> And other just ignored?
>
> Du the linguist just like
> Some languages ?
>
> Or do they use only a limited set du tu human capacity?