H.M. Hubey wrote:
------------------------------------------------
II. Sumerian -g vs Turkic Ø, -y
1. gamar wuchtig sein (D.41)
ag?r ag(?r (DLT, I, 52)
2. garim Fluss-Aue (MSL, III, 109)
ar(?)k ?rmak, ark, germeç, kas,, kanal (DLT, I, 65)
I think in Clauson there is also "karim".
3. gaz to crush (Grd. 356). gaza zerbrechen (MSL, III, 143)
ez to crush, to pound, ezme crushed, pounded (Rd. 357)
The word is related to others such as qIr (scrape), kIr (break), kIrIntI
(crushed rock?)
etc. and to *karu/*karo (to dig), xIrshI (grind, crush), etc. Literally dozens
of roots
having to do with stone and things you do with stone tools.
4. geme Magd (MSL, III, 125; D. 45)
eke büyük k?z kardes, (DLT, I, 685, eget gerdek gecesi gelin için
gönderilen hizmetçi kad?n (DLT), I, 51)
The word is related to Akkadian eHatu(m), eHaSu(m) (sister) which shows up
in Luwian
as negash. It shows up in Turkic in various forms as eke, eket, egech (sister)
and
then in rounded forms such as Og (mother), Oge (foster, adopted), OgsUz (orphan).
ProtoTurkic initial-n is lost, leaving negash>egech. The Nostratic root
had to be
*nekathum which also gave rise to Turkic katun (woman). Notice the words
nephew
and nepot. No sound law of linguistics explains w=t (last consonant) except
mine,
and it works accross several language families. Notice that since we see
English
f (ph, e.g., nephew) and Latin nepot (p) and since Latin p=f Germanic this
is
old enough to have gone thru these changes.
5. gi Rohr (MSL, III 121, 144), REED(s) Grds. 357)
? ag(aç, ekin, bitki, orman EUSz. 81)
This word agach is probably at the root of words like acassia, and another
word
which escapes me right now and has to do with tree, and also arrows. "ekin"
means
"planting" with the verbal root "ek" ( to plant) which is most likely at
the root of
"agriculture" e.g. *ag which is likely also from Etruscan. "Bitki" is from
"bit" (to grow)
and which also shows up as bU(t), and also bUyU (to grow). It shows up in
Sumerian
as bu (to grow), and Hittite as miya (to grow). It shows up in words such
as
bUyUk, biyik, miyik (tall, high) etc. I bet nobody can etymologize the famous
English
word "big" or even believe that it can be directly related to "biyik" and
that it
can easily be a borrowing from about 200 years of Hunnish rule. That is
why historical linguistics
is still mostly chauvenism not science.
6. gid 1. entfernen (D. 60)
?d salmak, göndermek, serbest b?rakmak (DLT,I,210); salmak,
göndermek, serbest b?rakmak, geçirmek, ulas,t?rmak (KBI., 181)
to let go, to let free, to send, to allow to be free, to allow to reach,
etc.
This now shows up as "iy", and shows up in "iye" (master, owner) and is likely
the word in Sumerian "Ea".
7. gid (II gid2) drängen (D.60)
it- itmek(DLT, I, 17I)
to push
8. gig to be ill, to ache, to hurt, to give pain (Grd. 358)
ig hastal?k (DLT, I, 48), hastal?k, hasta (KBI.. 188)
illness, sickness
9. gis, wood , tree (GRD. 360)
y?s, orman, dag(, ag(aç, çal? (EHG. 436)
10. gis,ig Tür (D. I 30), door (EHG. 436)
es,ik kap? (KBI., 206)
eshik=kapI = door
esh is likely "ach" (to open). and kap has lots of meanings including
"to cover", kapa=to close, e.g. to enclose, to cover, kabuk=skin, bark,
kap = pumpkin, kap=container, etc.
11. gis,kim willow (MSL, IV, 20)
y?lg?n ?lg?n, ?lg?n, ag(ac?, Tamariska (DLT, III, 375 ?lg?n tamarisk
(Rd. 501)
12. gud ox (Grd. 362), Stier (D.51). gu Rind (MSL, III, 137)
ud s?g(?r, öküz (GLT, I, 45), bog(a (burcu); s?g(?r KBI., 488)
okuz=ox.
Altaic and Turkic are supposed to have had an initial-p that changed to a
bilabial fricative
and then disappeared. This is likely the root of this e.g. *pOkUrz (according
to Doerfer),
and likely related to pecus. It is claimed as usual to be a borrowing e.g.
from Tocharian(?)
uchsen(?). One wonders how the words hOkur can be derived from uchsen but
to most
Turkologists that is not germane. Then celebrate when they can claim something
in Turkic
is borrowed from Chinese, Arabic, Iranian, Tocharian, Ket, Korean, Mongolian,
Japanese,
French, English, German, Russian, Sanskrit, ....
13. gukin ökumene (MSL, III, 1465, krs,. ukkin Versammlung (MSL,
III, 146)
ökün para, gül ve buna benzer s,eylerin y?g(?n? (DLT, I, 75),
öküm y?g(?n (DLT, I, 755; üg- y?g(mak (KBI., 504)
14. gur10(x) ernten (D. 55)
or- kesmek, biçmek, vurmak (DLT, I, 14)
Clearly related to words like "kIr" (break), and wur/ur (hit), the kinds
of things
you do when you reap, cut, etc.
15. gurun6 Ernte (D. 55)
orum kesim (DLT, I, 75)
III. Sumerian -m vs Turkic -k
This m=k equivalence is very strange and very distant and something
that should no longer be avoided in Nostratic studies.
1. mal (Emesal) to stay (for gal), (Grd. 384)
kal- kalmak (DLT, I, 41; KBI., 215)
kal= to stay
2. marun Ameise (D. 160)
kar?nça kar?nca (DLT, III, 375)
karinca= ant
It shows up in Russian as sarancha.
3. mas, Grenze (D. 160)
kas, herhangi bir s,eyin k?y?s? (DLT, III, 152)
the corner of something
clearly from kes (to cut), and dozens of related words.
4. mas, Zwilling (MSL, III, 133)
kos, çift, çifte, herhangi bir s,eyin çifti, es,i (DLT, I, 359)
double
5. mir anger (MSL, IV, 35)
k?z- 1. To be angry, cross, il tempered; to be angry, vexed (with), 2.
To get hot& (Rd. 661), k?zga- (kul) k?z?p uzaklas,t?rmak, kak?mak
(DLT, III. 290)
dozens of related words e.g. kIz.
In fact there is even the m-word in Turkic mIrIlda, and the doublet mIrIn
kIrIn, meaning
to mumble under the breath, and protest, e.g. a low intensity version of
anger.
6. mu name, fame (literally name) (Grd. 388; MSL, V, 65)
kü ün, s,an (DLT, III. 212); ün, san (KBI., 220)
fame
7. mud Blut (MSL, III, 100), blood (Grd. 389)
kan kan (DLT, I, 192; KBI., 220)
Iranian xun (blood) is likely from Bolgaric prototurkic, and since
PIE for blood is sang, it looks like Turkic retains the proto-proto-IE word
since due to the kentum-satem split the kentum languages should have had
*kang and not sang. Even something this simple is difficult enough to admit
for most IEanists. I wonder often what drives them or paralyzes them.
8. mulu Fuss (D, 165)
köl foot, leg (Lessing, 483)
kol=arm
karIsh= the distance based on arm/hand
apIsh = region between the legs.
aw = region between the legs
it looks like they originally referred to front and rear legs of animals.
Akkadian has
QATUM (arm). The word for apple has been said to be from Hebrew, abol, which
also means "testicle" and one can see here that the root *ap/ab refers to
the rear
legs and in between the legs. The root shows up in ApsatI (pagan goddess
of hunting
in Karachay-Balkar), avla (to hunt), Mongolian abla (to hunt), Apsara (hunter,
Abkhazian),
also aksa < *apsa (to limp). There must have been some special way to
disable large animals
before the age of metals, etc. perhaps they struck the animal hard in the
testicles to stun it
and bring it down quickly. Everyone knows what a kick to the testicles does
:-)
Now that brings up the question of what "Apis Bull" is doing in Egypt and
Sumer?
PS. Turkic is split along l=sh, and r=z. and obviously abol=abosh (apIsh).
9. mulu (Emesal) man (Grd. 388)
kul kul, köle (DLT, I, 27; KBI., 289)
slave
10. mus,en Vogel (MSL, III, 55), bird (Grd. 389)
kus, kus,, (DLT, I, 22; KBI., 293)
bird
And it can easily be seen to be related to goose, gans, anders, Turkic kaz
(goose) etc.
I derived all these words using the same sound changes that I have shown
and it can
be found among the posts either on the Aturan languages list or the Turkoloji
list. It can
also be connected with kanat (wing), and *kadh (snow storm). See Herodotus.
it can only
be done in Turkic.
--
Mark Hubey
hubeyh@...
http://www.csam.montclair.edu/~hubey
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nostratica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--
Mark Hubey
hubeyh@...
http://www.csam.montclair.edu/~hubey