----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:32
AM
Subject: Re: [Nostratica] Re: replacement
rates
I have no idea what you are talking about. Please explain.
Gerry wrote:
Without a beginning and end, your metrics turn
into a semantic debate.
Gerry
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:01 AM
Subject:
Re: [Nostratica] Re: replacement rates
Our problem is not that difficult.
tgpedersen
wrote:
--- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com,
"H.M. Hubey" <hubeyh@...> wrote:
> I am
not sure I understand. I am only discussing creating a
semantics
> metric for a short
> list of words. I only suggest that
the short list size be a power
of 2
> so that we can
use
> binary/boolean concepts. Any list has to be
finite in order to be
> useful. We cannot
> handle
infinity.
>
> Geraldine Reinhardt wrote:
>
>
> Sorry. I'm not clear as to how you will deliniate your
"Hubey"
list.
> > If there is no final number,
then the list should exist
> > for infinity?
Right?
> >
> > Gerry
> >
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: H.M. Hubey <mailto:hubeyh@...>
>
> To: Nostratica@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nostratica@yahoogroups.com>
>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:48
PM
> > Subject: Re: [Nostratica] Re:
replacement rates
> >
> > No
final number. This will work for something like the Swadesh
>
> list. There are other
>
> ways to get semantic distances from
dictionaries. I would be
> >
interesting to compare
> > them after
they have been worked out.
> >
>
> Geraldine Reinhardt wrote:
>
>
> >> Interesting. Does
that leave the final number at infinity
(in
>
>> the power of 2)?
>
>>
>
>> Gerry
> >>
>
>> ----- Original
Message -----
>
>> From: H.M.
Hubey <mailto:hubeyh@...>
>
>> To: Nostratica@yahoogroups.com
>
>> <mailto:Nostratica@yahoogroups.com>
>
>> Sent: Tuesday,
February 04, 2003 9:51 AM
>
>> Subject: Re:
[Nostratica] Re: replacement rates
> >>
>
>> IT would have
to be in powers of 2. I got started on 32
>
>> already. We can
double it
>
>> to 64,
then 128. We'd have to add 28 more to Swadesh
100.
>
>> Then we can
double to
>
>> 256, and we
only need 28 more for that.
> >>
>
>> Gerry
wrote:
> >>
>
>>> Most
interesting. Yet based on Boolean ideas, how many
>
>>> words would
be contained in renovating the Swadesh list?
>
>>>
> >>>
Gerry
> >>>
>
>>>
----- Original Message -----
>
>>>
From: H.M. Hubey <mailto:hubeyh@...>
>
>>>
To: Nostratica@yahoogroups.com
>
>>>
<mailto:Nostratica@yahoogroups.com>
>
>>>
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 6:01 AM
>
>>>
Subject: Re: [Nostratica] Re: replacement rates
>
>>>
>
>>>
There is a shorter way. We can start with a subset
of
>
>>>
the Swadesh list. Yakhontov
>
>>>
already has a shorter version which has 35 words. A
>
>>>
simple metric should probably
>
>>>
be based on Boolean ideas. 32 is a good number
since it
>
>>>
is a power of 2. I already
>
>>>
got started but haven't had time to pay attention
to it.
>
>>>
If anyone is interested, we can
>
>>>
collaborate.
> >>>
>
>>>
tgpedersen wrote:
> >>>
>
>>>>
--- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com,
"H.M. Hubey"
>
>>>>
<hubeyh@...> wrote:
>
>>>>
>
>
>>>>
>
>
>>>>
>
>
>>>>
>
>
>>>>
> I think what linguistics needs is a "semantic
>
>>>>
metric". I know how
>
>>>>
to
>
>>>>
> derive at least two different
>
>>>>
> ones from data but need time and money :-) I
think
>
>>>>
all linguists
>
>>>>
should
>
>>>>
> appreciate the need for
>
>>>>
> semantic metrics. It does not matter how many.
That
>
>>>>
could always be
>
>>>>
> worked out, fixed,
>
>>>>
> repaired, improved etc. The trick is to get
going.
>
>>>>
>
>
>>>>
That would require us to know some canonical
>
>>>>
development of a
>
>>>>
canonical set of concepts. That is a tall order.
>
>>>>
>
>>>>
Torsten
If you are serious about your semantics metrics, I
recommend you read
some of Doug Lenat's articles on his program
"Eurisko", a program
that built a conceptual world from axioms of
set theory until it ran
into computational difficulties constructing
prime number theory. It
will give you a perspective on the problems
at hand. They can be
found in the journal "Artifical Intelligence"
some time in the early
eighties.
Torsten
To unsubscribe from
this group, send an email to:
Nostratica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
--
M. Hubey
-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The only difference between humans and machines is that humans
can be created by unskilled labor. Arthur C. Clarke
/\/\/\/\//\/\/\/\/\/\/ http://www.csam.montclair.edu/~hubey
To
unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nostratica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:
Nostratica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--
M. Hubey
-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The only difference between humans and machines is that humans
can be created by unskilled labor. Arthur C. Clarke
/\/\/\/\//\/\/\/\/\/\/ http://www.csam.montclair.edu/~hubey
To
unsubscribe from this group, send an email
to:
Nostratica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.