-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:32 AM
Subject:
Re: [Nostratica] Re: replacement rates
I have no idea what you are talking about. Please explain.
Gerry wrote:
Without a beginning and end, your
metrics turn into a semantic debate.
Gerry
-----
Original Message -----
Sent:
Wednesday, February 05, 2003 7:01 AM
Subject:
Re: [Nostratica] Re: replacement rates
Our problem is not that difficult.
tgpedersen wrote:
---
In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com,
"H.M. Hubey" <hubeyh@...> wrote:
> I am not sure I understand. I am only discussing creating a
semantics
> metric for a short
> list of words. I only suggest that the short list size be a
power
of 2
> so that we can use
> binary/boolean concepts. Any list has to be finite in order
to be
> useful. We cannot
> handle infinity.
>
> Geraldine Reinhardt wrote:
>
> > Sorry. I'm not clear as to how you will deliniate your
"Hubey"
list.
> > If there is no final number, then the list should exist
> > for infinity? Right?
> >
> > Gerry
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: H.M. Hubey <mailto:hubeyh@...>
> > To: Nostratica@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:Nostratica@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:48 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Nostratica] Re: replacement rates
> >
> > No final number. This will work for something like
the Swadesh
> > list. There are other
> > ways to get semantic distances from dictionaries.
I would be
> > interesting to compare
> > them after they have been worked out.
> >
> > Geraldine Reinhardt wrote:
> >
> >> Interesting. Does that leave the final number
at infinity
(in
> >> the power of 2)?
> >>
> >> Gerry
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: H.M. Hubey <mailto:hubeyh@...>
> >> To: Nostratica@yahoogroups.com
> >> <mailto:Nostratica@yahoogroups.com>
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003
9:51 AM
> >> Subject: Re: [Nostratica] Re: replacement
rates
> >>
> >> IT would have to be in powers of
2. I got started on 32
> >> already. We can double it
> >> to 64, then 128. We'd have to add
28 more to Swadesh
100.
> >> Then we can double to
> >> 256, and we only need 28 more for
that.
> >>
> >> Gerry wrote:
> >>
> >>> Most interesting. Yet based
on Boolean ideas, how many
> >>> words would be contained in renovating
the Swadesh list?
> >>>
> >>> Gerry
> >>>
> >>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> From: H.M. Hubey <mailto:hubeyh@...>
> >>> To: Nostratica@yahoogroups.com
> >>> <mailto:Nostratica@yahoogroups.com>
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 04,
2003 6:01 AM
> >>> Subject: Re: [Nostratica]
Re: replacement rates
> >>>
> >>> There is a shorter way. We
can start with a subset
of
> >>> the Swadesh list. Yakhontov
> >>> already has a shorter version
which has 35 words. A
> >>> simple metric should probably
> >>> be based on Boolean ideas.
32 is a good number
since it
> >>> is a power of 2. I already
> >>> got started but haven't had
time to pay attention
to it.
> >>> If anyone is interested,
we can
> >>> collaborate.
> >>>
> >>> tgpedersen wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> --- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com,
"H.M. Hubey"
> >>>> <hubeyh@...>
wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I think what linguistics
needs is a "semantic
> >>>> metric". I know how
> >>>> to
> >>>> > derive at least
two different
> >>>> > ones from data but
need time and money :-) I
think
> >>>> all linguists
> >>>> should
> >>>> > appreciate the need
for
> >>>> > semantic metrics.
It does not matter how many.
That
> >>>> could always be
> >>>> > worked out, fixed,
> >>>> > repaired, improved
etc. The trick is to get
going.
> >>>> >
> >>>> That would require us
to know some canonical
> >>>> development of a
> >>>> canonical set of concepts.
That is a tall order.
> >>>>
> >>>> Torsten
If you are serious about your semantics metrics, I recommend you
read
some of Doug Lenat's articles on his program "Eurisko", a program
that built a conceptual world from axioms of set theory until it
ran
into computational difficulties constructing prime number theory.
It
will give you a perspective on the problems at hand. They can be
found in the journal "Artifical Intelligence" some time in the early
eighties.
Torsten
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nostratica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--
M. Hubey
-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The only difference between humans and machines is that humans
can be created by unskilled labor. Arthur C. Clarke
/\/\/\/\//\/\/\/\/\/\/ http://www.csam.montclair.edu/~hubey
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nostratica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nostratica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
--
M. Hubey
-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
The only difference between humans and machines is that humans
can be created by unskilled labor. Arthur C. Clarke
/\/\/\/\//\/\/\/\/\/\/ http://www.csam.montclair.edu/~hubey
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Nostratica-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.