From: tgpedersen
Message: 73
Date: 2002-12-18
> ----- Original Message -----about
> From: tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...>
> --- In Nostratica@yahoogroups.com, "John <jdcroft@...>"
> <jdcroft@...> wrote:
> > Alexander
> >
> > You asked
> > > [A]
> > > Do you mean O.Trubachev's book "Indoarica v Severnom
> > Prichernomorie"?
> > > Yes, the distance between pre-Cimmerian times and today is
> 3-partly
> > 3.5 millennia. But Trubachev relies mainly on ancient and
> > medieval toponyms and personal names. Only very few of themthis
> survived
> > till our days. If only they were available for investigations I
> think
> > nobody could prove their Indo-Aryan origin. So I think that in
> > example the time of the _reliable surviving_ should beshortened
> tillinconvenient
> > the Greek or Roman times, i.e. about 1.000 years.
> > > On the other hand the Ukrainian steppes were a very
> > place for preserving archaic toponyms - so often nation changedpopulation
> > there, and as a rule with a great violence, when the old
> > disappeared very quickly.across it
> >
> > I haven't read anything academic on this subject. I came
> aconnect
> > couple of years ago in a detailed discussion on Cybalist.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > John
>
> That was mostly me proposed the connection. Classical writers
> the Cimmerians with the Cimbri of Jutland, who have beenconnected
> with the landscape Himmerland, and Cymru and Cumbria and ... Atleast
> in Denmark the time fits approximately, Celtic (now pre-Roman)Iron
> Age beginning approx. 500 BCE.(not an Iranian one as is thought usually)?
>
> Torsten
>
> Torsten,
>
> Why do you think that the Cimmerians spoke an Indo-Arian language
> Did the Cimbri have any peculiarities in the vocabulary which couldbe attested as an Indo-Arian heritage? Or in the Jutland toponymy?
>I don't think I have committed myself either way. BTW, Karl-Horst
> Alexander
>