Re: Valtellinese verca (was: Ligurian)

From: stlatos
Message: 69585
Date: 2012-05-12

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos" <stlatos@...> wrote:
>

>
> A simple change such as that could connect it to:
>
> * wer.-kó+ > varëka- = leaf Av;
>
> but that in itself complicates things as it could also be from:
>
> * wer.-x-kó+ > varëka- = leaf Av;
>
> which allows more, as that could connect it to:
>
> * wer.-x-kó+ > * wer.s.-kHó+ > * wer.-kHs.ó+ > varës^a- Av;
>
> and with r., not er. :
>
> * wr.-x-kó+ > * wr.s.-kHó+ > * wr.-kHs.ó+ > vr.ks.á-s = tree/
> trunk/wood/staff of a bow RV S;
>


Also, including Slavic * wer.s.-kó+ \ * wer.-ks.ó+ > vr^esk \ vr^es = heather Cz; the presence of another C that surfaces as 0 or s in the cognates of verca is assured. Together:


* wer.-x-n.-kó+ > * wer.-x-r.-kó+ > * wer.-x-kó+ > verca = heather Valt It; varëka- = leaf Av;

* wer.-x-kó+ > * wer.s.-kHó+ > vr^esk = heather Cz;

* wer.s.-kHó+ > * wer.-kHs.ó+ > vr^es = heather Cz; varës^a- Av;

and with r., not er. :

* wr.-x-kó+ > * wr.s.-kHó+ > * wr.-kHs.ó+ > vr.ks.á-s = tree/
trunk/wood/staff of a bow RV S;

among many other possible cognates.