From: Torsten
Message: 67875
Date: 2011-06-30
>The Germanic weak declension corresponds to the Latin 3rd declension n-stems, for the same cases of the Latin cognate of guma:
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh <gknysh@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Any chance the terms "Argaragantes" (incl. variants) and
> > > "Limigantes" could be understood as latinized versions of Gothic
> > > plurals "argaragans" and "limigans" (with the first portion
> > > being of Iranic provenance, as explained by Francesco Brighenti
> > > in message 64571) ? (I'm looking at various texts dealing with
> > > Danubian area events in the 4th century).
> > >
> >
> > Unlikely. -ans is the m.pl.acc. ending, not nom. I don't think
> > there are any examples of Latin -antes from Germanic *-ans.
>
> ****GK: What about this example of "weak declension" nominative
> plural? Cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gothic_language /at
> "guma"/ I was imagining a Roman hearing a Goth lamely describing the
> Limigantes as "limigans" and 'correcting" this to Limigantes (since
> Limigans would sound like a singular form).****