From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 67866
Date: 2011-06-28
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr GasiorowskiOnly if one deliberately distorts the attested semantics by
> <gpiotr@...> wrote:
>> W dniu 2011-06-26 08:09, Torsten pisze:
>>> Trick question: what would happen to PIE *stVló- in
>>> Oscan?
>> Two things wouldn't: *o > a: and k > g
> That's true for a regular derivation within PIE; I suspect
> that both Latin (st)locus and Oscan sla(a)gi- are
> substrate words, related to those Boutkan discusses here:
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/61680
> the semantics of which, "swamp" etc, would match the Oscan
> sense of "border";