From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 67846
Date: 2011-06-23
> ****GK: It seems clear enough that "Wenceslas/Vaclav/Vyacheslav "I have little doubt that Vyatko as an eponymic protoplast is a popular
> has a sound Slavic etymology in terms of "more fame", and as such
> has no real connection to the Venet(d)s. What is not (yet) clear to
> me is that Vyatko is a variant (diminutive?) of Vyacheslav. I would
> have expected something like Vyatsko or Vyachko. There's no problem
> with his "brother" Radym (whence allegedly the Rady(i)michi. And
> there's no problem with the -ichi Slavic suffix in Vy(i)atichi.
> Standard stuff esp. for early Slavic groups. The patronymic descent
> label may or may not have been a latter day construction by some
> Kyivan chronicler. "Vyatko" an ancestor of "Vyatichi" seems adequate
> in that context. Then I think of the river Vyatka, which looks like
> a Slavic reformulation of some Udmurtian name ("vu" meaning "water"
> in Udmurtian acc. to some). And the Vyatichi of history were a
> Slavic (or Balto-Slavic if the Golyad' of the sources is their
> sub-tribe), occupying and colonizing Finno-Ugrian territory. One
> tends to forget that their main historical city was Ryazan' (which
> is a Slavic term connected to Erzya (=Mordvinian). Who (or what)
> then is "Vyatko"? And if it's "Vyatichi" which is then our prime
> source datum, then maybe it does bring us back to a Vent- label?
> Which only adds another mysterious "Venetic" issue to the existing
> pile (:-))*****