From: Torsten
Message: 67598
Date: 2011-05-23
> Proposal:Strabo 6.3.1
> (I'm not decided on whether I'll use a vowel plus Å (-VÅ-) or a nasalized vowel (-VN-) in the recontructions)
>
>
> *daÅ-/daN- > *daw-
> *daÅ-/daN- > *daNk- > *dak-
> *daÅ-/daN- + -sk- > dansk
> (*daÅ-isk´- > *duÅIsk´- > Pol. duÅsk-)
> (*daÅ-yan-> *daNk-yan- > *daÄan-)
>
> *sweÅ-/sweN- > *swew-
> *sweÅ-/sweN- > *sweNk- > *swek- (Sueci)
> *sweÅ-/sweN- + -sk- > *svensk
>
> *graÅ-/*graN- > *graw- > *grai, grae
> *graÅ-/graN- > *graÅk- > *graek-
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dacians
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dacia
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dacian
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dacian#Substratum_of_Proto-Romanian
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albanian_language#.28Old.29_Albanian
> (the Old Albanian referred to here would be Dacian; note that the
> diagnostic suffixed definite article is also a feature of of North
> Germanic minus Vestjysk and would be just as indicative of a Dacian
> substrate, cf the thread starting in
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/9815
> )
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danes_(Germanic_tribe)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danes
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danish_tongue
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dane%C5%9F (??)
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suevi
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedes_(Germanic_tribe)
> (note all the *sven- side forms)
> http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?search=swain&searchmode=none
>
> (cf. Kretschmer above)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greeks#Names (see Greeks)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graea
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graeae
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crone (?)
>
> The choices of Dak- Graek- over Dai-, Grae- as reflects of *daÅ-,
> *graÅ- seem to have taken place at about the same time.
>
>
> which BTW vindicates (I think) my derivation of crassus, grossus etc
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/66586
> as a participle *gr-áÅ- "grown old, ripe, juicy". What verbs *d-áÅ-, > *sw-éŠcould be participles of is difficult to know. Words so short
> are suspect of being back formations from compounds, in casu
> 1) from the *-daÅ occurring in the Dacian towns in -dava (the town
> name then being the name of its people)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Dacian_cities#Dacian
> and in the various -danes mentioned in Beowulf (Spear-danes,
> East-danes, West-danes etc),
> http://www.heorot.dk/beowulf-rede-notes.html
> *-daÅ being ultimately cognate to Celtic dun-, Germanic *tun-?),
> 2) and from the *-sweÅ (swain) occuring in eg boatswain (used much
> more in eg. Danish, cf. eg. 'svend' "master craftsman"
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_craftsman
> corresponding to the German term 'Geselle'
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_craftsman#Germany
> used in compounds: slagtersvend, murersvend, bagersvend etc
> ).
>
> All this adds up to Dacians (Free Dacians?)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Dacians
> making up part of either the 10 BCE or 250 CE (Brøndsted, as emended
> by me) invasion of Denmark, see quote here:
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/66612
> The main difference between Thracians and Dacians would be that the
> former slave-traded the latter. If so, the Burebista
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burebista
> regime, made possible by the discovery of gold(?)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dacian_bracelets
> or by reserving gold for the king's use alone(?)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dacia#Occupations
> would have been an economic disaster to Thracian slave-traders.
>