From: tgpedersen
Message: 64239
Date: 2009-06-23
>He didn't know any better.
>
>
> --- On Tue, 6/23/09, tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> --- In cybalist@... s.com, george knysh <gknysh@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Forgetting that hopeless (whether old or new) Odin scenario, and
> > just concentrating on "Nemetes" as a possible source of the
> > Slavic "Nemtsi/Nimtsi" .
>
> Call it the Ariovistus (Harjagist-) scenario then. It's the same
> thing. Both are titles, not names.
>
> ****GK: Ariovistus was certainly a name for Caesar.
> His title (since 59 BCE) was "rex".Not to his men it wasn't. That was what the Romans called him. Besides the difference wasn't that great, cf dux/herizogo.
> shetl. koll 'alter mann';(Karsten, Sv. bygd 1, 76; oder doch urspr. finnisch? Setälä FUF 13, 1913, 377);
> orkn. karl 'männliche essbare krabbe' (Marwick 83);
> norm. ON. Calleville (Jakobsen DSt 1911, 67);
> finn. karilas 'schwacher greis'
> lpN. galles, kaltes 'alter mann, ehemann' (...). ahd. karl 'mann, ehemann', daneben abl.
> No point in rehashing the Odin pseudo-history of Snorri SturlusonNot with you there ain't. I look forward to you actually refuting it.
> BTW.****
>No, you are.
> > --- On Mon, 6/22/09, tgpedersen <tgpedersen@ ...> wrote:
> >
> > --- In cybalist@... s.com, "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@ ...> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In cybalist@... s.com, george knysh <gknysh@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@ > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > BTW
> > > > > http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Nemetes
> > > > > http://en.wikipedia .org/wiki/ Niemcza
> > > > >
> > > > > That would make sense if the Nemetes had come all the way
> > > > > from Przeworsk-land with Ariovistus. The question is then:
> > > > > how close would the Slavs have to have been at the time A.
> > > > > left with them for that to be their designation for
> > > > > Germanic?
> >
> >
> > GK: A direct derivation of the Slavic term from the Caesar time
> > "Nemetes" hardly seems possible.
>
> Au contraire. It seems impossible to avoid.
> http://tinyurl. com/mr42x3
>
> ****GK: You're missing the point.
> The old idea that there were "Slavs" in 1rst c. BCE Przeworsk isThey would only have had to be there long enough, coming from the east, to join Ariovistus' campaign.
> untenable.
> I'm not sure you can speak of "Slavs" anywhere at that time. But ifRemind me?
> there already were some genuine proto-Slavs somewhere in 75-58 BCE
> it would be considerably east and north of Przeworsk (cf.
> Shchukin's excellent analyses).
> These protos would thus have borrowed the term for Germanics fromThe Vlach term would be Bloch etc in Venetic transmission, if my suspicion of Venetic w- -> b- should be correct.
> "Venedic" intermediaries (if this hypothesis is correct). It would
> thus be not a direct but an indirect derivation, like the later
> "Vlach" via Gothic.****
> > Whether it could have come to them from a Venetic/VenedicShould I get a Ukrainian dictionary now? Do you have examples of those names?
> > expression for "Germans" (or "western neighbours") might be worth
> > investigating. Perhaps there is an analogy to the Germanic
> > "Wends" for Slavs, or "Vlachs" for Romanians etc. (to Slavic via
> > Gothic).
> > If one assumes that the Lusatian culture and offshoots were
> > basically Venetic/Venedic, and did with "Nemetes" what the early
> > Germanics did with the Celtic "Volcae", then the transmission
> > might have taken place within the Zarubinian culture period
> > (Zarubinians being Tacitus' migrant "Venedi" and prime
> > contributors to historical Slavic ethnogenesis. > >
>
> Seeing as the name Volcae fits into my whole Bolg- scheme I was
> wondering if they were not originally an ar-/ur- speaking coast
> people.
>
> How about the Nemetes being a subgroup under Venetic/Lusatian
> instead? Then as the Venetic (Wendisch) Nemetes became Germanified
> the name stuck. The fact that a majority of them emigrated under A.
> and only survived as scattered refugees in Denmark would help that
> transition a lot too.
>
> ****GK: What you call "Venetic" Ukrainian linguists refer to as
> "Illyrian" or "Celto-Illyrian". There is an interesting study
> identifying a number of such "Illyrian" hydronyms in the Ros' river
> basin (south of Kyiv). They could be linked to the spread of the
> Zarubinian culture in the 3rd c. BCE And the possibly "Illyrian"
> ("Venetic"?) Zarubinians (Late Lusatian/Pomorian culture) were
> accompanied by Jastorf elements (their "Nemetes"?).
> That's a possibility. Though the folk-etymologyThe thing that impressed me in Vasmer was
> "speakers/non-speakers" seems much later, perhaps as late as the
> time of Cyril and Methodius.****
>