[SPAM] [SPAM] [tied] Re: Latin /a/ after labials, IE *mori

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:

>
> On 2009-06-13 00:10, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> > This is a detail Piotr , a reshaped in -o:,-e:re is understandable
>
> I'm afraid it's a real problem. Other *CoRh2-aje- verbs were not
> reshaped like that, at least not in Latin. We also have <tono:> from
> *stonh2-áje/o- and <sono:> from *swonh2-áje- despite the existence of
> alternative infinitives in <-ere> (not <-e:re>!).
>
> Piotr

Secondly if swenh- has -h2- in the root is difficult to explain why OIr seinn has an e/o inflection

So is better to consider sona:re as a denominative derived from sonus.

(In addition as you know we have sonere as well, that seems to be the oldest form (even it represents a different formation))

A similar situation is that one of tona:re where a denominative from tonus is the trivial solution.

(In addition as you know we have tonere as well, that seems to be the oldest form too (even it represents a different formation), attested only once or twice)

Marius