From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 64164
Date: 2009-06-13
>you are right is <-ere> (it was a typo on my side )
> On 2009-06-13 00:10, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> > This is a detail Piotr , a reshaped in -o:,-e:re is understandable
>
> I'm afraid it's a real problem. Other *CoRh2-aje- verbs were not
> reshaped like that, at least not in Latin. We also have <tono:> from
> *stonh2-áje/o- and <sono:> from *swonh2-áje- despite the existence of
> alternative infinitives in <-ere> (not <-e:re>!).
>
> Piotr