--- In
cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:
>
> On 2009-06-13 00:10, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> > This is a detail Piotr , a reshaped in -o:,-e:re is understandable
>
> I'm afraid it's a real problem. Other *CoRh2-aje- verbs were not
> reshaped like that, at least not in Latin. We also have <tono:> from
> *stonh2-áje/o- and <sono:> from *swonh2-áje- despite the existence of
> alternative infinitives in <-ere> (not <-e:re>!).
>
> Piotr
One similar example, is vale:re :
This is an -eh1-stative, formed as usual, from the zero-grade *wlh2-eh1-that gives *vala:re ==> with regular -h2-eh1- > a: ....
BUT the word is vale:re so it was reshaped in e: => vale:re in order to retain the stative suffix e:
THIS CLEARLY SHOW YOU THAT A RESHAPE PROCESS TOOK PLACE.
Also a reshaped form can appear (sometimes) for one word and not to appear for others. Do you want examples?
So your -a: examples, cannot serve as arguments, when we are talking about re-shaping.
Marius