From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 63921
Date: 2009-05-22
>Sorry pleased read leg^-sk-i-s
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Alexandru Moeller <alxmoeller@> wrote:
> > I have pretty doubghts to consider dialectal differences such big
> > differences : Zalmoxis-?ebeleizis... which is the reason you think these
> > are one and the same name? To me it appears to be two difterent name,
> > too much of vocalic differences here, letting by side the rest..
> >
> >
> > Alex
>
>
> I have written in the past too:
>
> I started from Zamolxis and Gebelezis and I splitted in:
> a) a.1) Zamo- a.2) Gebe-
> b) b.1) -lxis b.2) -le(i)zis
>
> From here the similarities started to appear in much an obvious way
>
>
> For a) DZem- seems to be the ancien fonetic Common Form
>
> and I have applied
> e/accented > ya or ye (Diegis, Dielleina, Skyare)
> dzy > g^y or dzy
> m > mB > m or b (Museous~Buzau, Tibisia~Timis)
>
> Where :
> a.1) DZem- > [ e/accented > ya] > *DZyam (attested Zam-)
>
> a.2) DZem- > [ e/accented > ye] > DZjemb > G^emb- (attested Geb- )
>
> This first the root seems to be related to
> PIE dHg^Hem- 'earth' > DZem-
>
>
> For b) b.1) -lxis b.2) -le(i)zis *ledz-sk-is seems to be the common form
>
> a.1) *-ledz-sk-is > -ldzksis > -lxis
>
> a.1) *le(i)dz-sk-is > -le(i)dzis > -le(i)dzis
>
> This second root seems to be related to
> PIE leig^- 'to bind, to tie' > *leg^H-sk-i-s
>
>
> So Probably the real pronunciations was closer too:
> DZyamw& -ldzksis
> DZyemBwe-ledzksis ~ G^ebwe-ledzksis
> ===> 'The Tied-one in the earth' ' "The Bind-one in the earth'
> In Romanian the meaning would be 'Cel legat in t,&r^an&'
> Marius