Re: bhosos

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...> wrote:

>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@> wrote:

> > Anyway, it isn't likely to come from
> > *bHos-od- (whatever the origin of the strange suffix), as such a form
> > would have been affected by the open-syllable lengthening of *o
> > (Brugmann's Law).
>
>
> Even *bHos-od- has this issue .. bHVs- inside is obvious....
>
>
> Marius

'Anyway' ?

Skt. páti- is from PIE *poti- where the /o/ was clearly there 'from the begining' and the syllable is open too

So you know as me that there are additional explanations for such situations ....
(see <1.5> in https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/dspace/handle/1887/2666)

Or the syllable was really closed (I think so) and we don't have only -m.d or -od- ...in *bHos-od- / *bHos-m.d-

Marius