Re: Kuhn's ar-/ur-language

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Rick McCallister <gabaroo6958@...>
wrote:

>
> --- On Tue, 2/10/09, Arnaud Fournet <fournet.arnaud@...> wrote:
>
> > From: Arnaud Fournet <fournet.arnaud@...>
> > Subject: Re: [tied] Re: Kuhn's ar-/ur-language
> > To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 6:19 PM
> > >> ===========
> > >> There's no "whether"
> > >> as we know for sure that the word is attested with
> > both a
> > >> short and a long
> > >> i(:) depending on the author.
> > >> But the real issue is we have people in that field
> > who
> > >> cannot even read.
> > >> Pathetic.
> > >>
> > >> A.
> > >
> > > And is that a reason to insult someone? I don't
> > think so.
> > >
> > =======
> > I've been correct.
> > but enough is enough.
> > A.
> > ======
>
> George Bush, like Mussolini, was always right, and you saw where

being right got that pair of fools.

> Sometimes, it's better to be nice than right.
>

I'm going to ignore Mr. Right.