Re: Kuhn's ar-/ur-language

From: Rick McCallister
Message: 62974
Date: 2009-02-11

--- On Tue, 2/10/09, Arnaud Fournet <fournet.arnaud@...> wrote:

> From: Arnaud Fournet <fournet.arnaud@...>
> Subject: Re: [tied] Re: Kuhn's ar-/ur-language
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 6:19 PM
> >> ===========
> >> There's no "whether"
> >> as we know for sure that the word is attested with
> both a
> >> short and a long
> >> i(:) depending on the author.
> >> But the real issue is we have people in that field
> who
> >> cannot even read.
> >> Pathetic.
> >>
> >> A.
> >
> > And is that a reason to insult someone? I don't
> think so.
> >
> =======
> I've been correct.
> but enough is enough.
> A.
> ======

George Bush, like Mussolini, was always right, and you saw where being right got that pair of fools.
Sometimes, it's better to be nice than right.