From: tgpedersen
Message: 61084
Date: 2008-10-28
>language or a language closely related to Italic ("Italoid" is a term
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 10/28/08, Arnaud Fournet <fournet.arnaud@...> wrote:
>
> > From: Arnaud Fournet <fournet.arnaud@...>
> > Subject: Re: [tied] Re: Salt, s-/h- ALLOBROGES
> > To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2008, 1:34 PM
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...>
> >
> > Michel Lejeune,
> > Manuel de la langue Vénète
> >
> > [...]
> > Torsten
> >
> > ======
> >
> > Are you sure
> > the way you are using "Venetic"
> > makes any sense and has any relationship
> > with the way Lejeune uses "Vénète" ?
> >
> > I'm afraid you are calling someone
> > as a witness for your "hyper-Venetic" case
> > Who does not support anything of your own theories.
> >
> > My own understanding of Lejeune
> > (but I'm ready to acknowledge I'm not well enough
> > versed in it)
> > is that Lejeune assumes Venetic to be a kind of Italic
> > language.
> >
> > Arnaud
> >
> > ========
> I have to agree with Arnaud.
> Venetic, as we know it and as it has been named, is either an Italic
> In naming conventions, the oldest usage of the name usually applies,even when it is later determined to be wrong later on --e.g. there are
> So if you're are applying Venetic to something else than thelanguage spoken in NE Italy, you need to distinguish it.