Re: Salt, s-/h- ALLOBROGES

From: tgpedersen
Message: 61083
Date: 2008-10-28

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Arnaud Fournet" <fournet.arnaud@...>
wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...>
>
> Michel Lejeune,
> Manuel de la langue Vénète
>
> [...]
> Torsten
>
> ======
>
> Are you sure
> the way you are using "Venetic"
> makes any sense and has any relationship
> with the way Lejeune uses "Vénète" ?

I hope it makes sense. That's for everyone to decide for himself.
I use it in the 'Pokorny-sense'.


> I'm afraid you are calling someone
> as a witness for your "hyper-Venetic" case
> Who does not support anything of your own theories.

Fear not. I'm quoting Lejeune, not calling him upon him as witness for
anything.

> My own understanding of Lejeune
> (but I'm ready to acknowledge I'm not well enough versed in it)
> is that Lejeune assumes Venetic to be a kind of Italic language.

I can't find any statement in his book where he proposes that.


Torsten