From: Arnaud Fournet
Message: 60812
Date: 2008-10-11
----- Original Message -----
From: kishore patnaik
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Well, couple of people accepting does not amount to much, especially by
people like Mallory, who is being questioned nowadays.
========
By whom ?
Even though he is mainly an archeologist, I don't think He is very far from
the standard white line in the middle of the road.
Arnaud
=======
> I don;t know what you mean by hit and run?
==========
You are trying to explain each deity and each theonym like a huge collection
of unrelated entities.
The reason why Dumezil's approach is so strong is the relationships between
the entities matter as much as the entities themselves.
You fail to understand that.
Arnaud
============
> What I can not understand is you are not actually questioning my theory at
> all.
========
Your "theory" is obviously inadequate.
Wrong method, wrong premices, wrong results.
No improvement on previous theories.
Arnaud
=====
All of you are questioning the "mainstream" theories which I have quoted.
You are questioning Mcdonnell et al and not Kishore patnaik.
=====
MacDonnel is two centuries old,
Why don't you choose something even older to make sure it's even more
outdated ?
Arnaud
=======
> May be you have a theory your self. based on your singular hero Dumezil?
> Kishore patnaik
========
Yes, I do.
Arnaud
========