From: tgpedersen
Message: 59818
Date: 2008-08-16
> > > The notion that Indo-Iranian-speakers inhabited pre-CelticI don't think there's any indication it's an exonym.
> > > Britain might be jarring to some; hopefully stiff upper lips
> > > can be kept.
> >
> > I don't think a-vocalism alone is enough to characterize
> > Alteuropäisch as Indo-Iranian. On might imagine early IE dialects
> > in Europe not having undergone ablauting (*a > e, o, zero), or
> > gone ablauting > de-ablauting like Indo-Iranian. Note that the
> > Vandals (with non-ablauted /a/) at the mouth of the Oder (cf.
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vineta
> > ) are connected archaeologically with Vend-syssel (with
> > ablauted /e/)
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vendsyssel
> > and that the Langobardi, when they lived west of the Elbe were
> > called Vinnili (with Germanic *-en- > *-in-, from ablauted /e/).
> > From that it seems ablauting was dialectal in
> > Alteuropäisch/Venetic.
>
> Who gave the Vandals their name?
> They spoke an East Germanic language, so they were notNope. The only reason their language, of which we know nothing, is
> LINGUISTICALLY Veneti,
> just as the Slavic Wends of Lusatia were not.They were too. I think the Slav languages expanded westwards with the
> The Germans evidently retained a folk-memory of *Weneto:s betweenNot just in Germany.
> the Oder and the Vistula, just as other *Weneto:s west of the Elbe
> were remembered as Vinnili, and in the place-names noted by Hans
> Kuhn.