Re: Re[6]: Language (was: Re: African Languages (was: Re: Re[2]: [ti

From: Rick McCallister
Message: 58383
Date: 2008-05-05

--- "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@...>
>
> > I've read (and understood) several, both
> linguistic and
> > sociolinguistic. As far as the written language
> is
> > concerned, a Parisian standard was in use for
> administrative
> > and commercial purposes in most of the northern
> half of the
> > Hexagon by the end of the 15th century.
> >
> > The spoken language is of course another matter.
> During the
> > Sun King's reign 'bon usage' was defined by the
> Court;
> > subsequently what we might call the upper middle
> (or
> > business) class was probably the most important
> arbiter of
> > bon usage. Increasingly, however, this was
> associated with
> > the written language, and increasingly the spoken
> language
> > went its own way despite the best efforts of
> schoolteachers,
> > Academicians, and other would-be Canutes.
> >
> > Brian
> >
> =========
> Great,
>
> Denial is avowal,
> so you read (and understood [sic]).
> And you're now saying what I said from the start
> which you first denied.
>
> Over.
>
> Arnaud
> ==========
>
Re-read Bourdieu on languages habitus. Economic sand
social success almost always means following the
linguistic and cultural norms set at the top BUT those
from the lower classes who do so tend to alienate to
alienate their neighbors. So, we have a constant
continuum of acrolects and basilects.



____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ