From: tgpedersen
Message: 57879
Date: 2008-04-23
> > > If your linguistic reconstruction of Harigast asAccording to Grimm, 'Gast' is used in one sense of the independent
> > Ariovistus is
> > > correct (and I'm not saying it is),
> >
> > Please do. It means a lot to me.
> >
> >
> > > then this was a much earlier "Ariovistus", not the
> > Suebian warlord
> > > and king of Caesar's time.
> >
> > So the one Caesar mentions should properly be called
> > Ariovistus II?