Re: More by Bryant

----- Original Message -----
From: "kishore patnaik" <kishorepatnaik09@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 5:41 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [tied] More by Bryant


> >
> > Witzel whom I 'm ready to believe more than any astrogrpher or
> > astrographer
> > explains that this date of 3102BC is an invention of Va:ra:hamihira
> > circa
> > 500 AD,
> > on the basis of a back-calculation.
> > This datation is therefore worthless.
> > Arnaud
>
>
> What exactly you expect varha mihira or Aryabhatta to do???? And btw, what
> Mitzel is doing??? he is prepolating today's evidence into yesterday .
>
> Certainly, you did not expect a coin minted by Krishna to announce " Hi, I
> was minted in 3102 bce!", did you? If you are closed to ideas from other
> scientific realms (btw, astonomy of Varaha mihira and Aryabhatta is more
> exact science than today's so called socio or historical linguistics,
> which
> are more probabalistic valuations and in any case, based on subjected
> assumptions.
>
>
> The use of the word <primitive> does not look like a fact but conveys very
> heavy undertones.
>
>
> I am ready to discuss it and I would iron out my jargon if need be. Btw,
> you need not announce your name in every paragraph.


***

Patrick:

We have been requested to do this.


***
>
> have not written that
> > and I would appreciate you don't invent quotations.
> >
> > This will earn you a complain to the moderators.
>
>
>
> you are cribbing as if I have abused you in reply, it is correct I got
> mxed
> up and thot you wrote two mails. but i guess itz no great deal. I think it
> shuld be rick who ogt 2 b crying since he is not replied :)
>
>
>
> kishore patnaik
>