From: kishore patnaik
Message: 57525
Date: 2008-04-17
Witzel whom I 'm ready to believe more than any astrogrpher or astrographer
explains that this date of 3102BC is an invention of Va:ra:hamihira circa
500 AD,
on the basis of a back-calculation.
This datation is therefore worthless.
Arnaud
What exactly you expect varha mihira or Aryabhatta to do???? And btw, what Mitzel is doing??? he is prepolating today's evidence into yesterday .
Certainly, you did not expect a coin minted by Krishna to announce " Hi, I was minted in 3102 bce!", did you? If you are closed to ideas from other scientific realms (btw, astonomy of Varaha mihira and Aryabhatta is more exact science than today's so called socio or historical linguistics, which are more probabalistic valuations and in any case, based on subjected assumptions.
The use of the word <primitive> does not look like a fact but conveys veryI am ready to discuss it and I would iron out my jargon if need be. Btw, you need not announce your name in every paragraph.
heavy undertones.
have not written that
and I would appreciate you don't invent quotations.
This will earn you a complain to the moderators.
you are cribbing as if I have abused you in reply, it is correct I got mxed up and thot you wrote two mails. but i guess itz no great deal. I think it shuld be rick who ogt 2 b crying since he is not replied :)
kishore patnaik