From: Rick McCallister
Message: 56997
Date: 2008-04-07
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Rick McCallisterMy first impression was that there was a strong French
> <gabaroo6958@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- "Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@...> wrote:
> >
> > > At 5:21:12 PM on Sunday, April 6, 2008,
> > > fournet.arnaud
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: "tgpedersen" <tgpedersen@...>
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > >> Afrikaans is a creolized Dutch.
> > >
> > > > Afrikaans looks like a dialect of Dutch.
> > >
> > > That might be a little bit too strong, but it
> > > certainly is descended from 17th century Dutch.
> > >
> > > > It never stopped to be spoken by a majority of
> people
> > > > whose mother tongue was a set of dialectal
> varieties of
> > > > Dutch.
> > >
> > > Exactly. Since it was extraterritorial, it was
> subject to
> > > contact influences different from those of the
> (European)
> > > Dutch dialects, but 'creolized Dutch' is a gross
> > > exaggeration.
> > >
> > > Brian
> > >
> > I've seen descriptions of it as a creole language.
> > Dutch speakers tell me it's about a far from Dutch
> as
> > Jamaican patois is from English --more than the
> > difference between US and British English. It
> > supposedly has a simplified grammar and has
> influence
> > from german, French, English and various
> autochthonous
> > African languages.
>
> Compare for yourself:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrikaans_grammar
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_grammar
>
>
> Torsten
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>
>