Re: Re[3]: [tied] Gemination in Celtic

From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 56313
Date: 2008-03-30

>
> ===========
> My suggestion is to reinterpret *bHug^o
> as being *bhu?-k-
> which regularly gives :
> - Eastern forms like *bu(:)z-
> NB : Why is Avest u: long ?
> - Celtic as being *bu?-k > *bukk-
> - And Germanic is possible Klugenized
> from *bhu?k-n- (or Celtic LW)
>
> Arnaud
> ============
>
Another interesting example is
*bh_l_H2-k "beam, balk"

Pok 112-3
bhel-5 , meist mit -g^- (-k^-) Suffix:
bhelHg^-, bhelH-n-g^-, bheleg^-; bhlHk^-

Latin fulc-iƓ
suf-fla:-men

Lituanian balz^iena
Slavic bolzjno
Russian dialectal bolozno

Balk- blakk-
balcon

bala:kon
Welsh balog

Grec phalan-g-s

Same pattern as in
*bhu?-k
and
*la?-k- "lax"

Arnaud

==============