From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
Message: 55489
Date: 2008-03-18
>II. Now a question for your 'accent wondering theory'Kiparsky:
>======================================================
>IF the Original /e:/ in pate':r was long WHY YOUR 'WONDERING ACCENT
>THEORY' DIDN'T ARRIVE TO MOVE IT on PENUL. SYLLABLE AS EXPECTED (and
>as you have proposed for /tHu-ga'-t:er/ after it would have dance for
>awhile on the first syllable /tHu'-ga-t:er/?
>
> (te:r in pate':r, being a heavy syllable too isn't it, as in
>dHuga'te:r too...)
>... the process of IAMBIC RETRACTION."Polysyllabic" here means "having 3 or more syllables".
>This process, first identified in Bartoli 1930, deaccents
>a final iambic sequence (^ -') in polysyllabic words,
>resulting in recessive accentuation.