From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 55480
Date: 2008-03-18
> I.(and
>
> 1. So suddenly it's not From Vocative 'dance'?
>
> 2. Or from ma':te:r because 'daughters will become mothers'?
>
>
> ============> How quick you have changed your opinion.
>
> IAMBIC RETRACTION theory Miguel is not applicable for tHuga'te:r
>
> There are multiple points of view in that article, that the author
> presented, some of them in contradiction.
> You cannot quote all of them in the same time. :)
> Please take a look first who said thsi and who said thta.
>
>
> II. Now a question for your 'accent wondering theory'
> ======================================================
> IF the Original /e:/ in pate':r was long WHY YOUR 'WONDERING ACCENT
> THEORY' DIDN'T ARRIVE TO MOVE IT on PENUL. SYLLABLE AS EXPECTED
> as you have proposed for /tHu-ga'-t:er/ after it would have dancefor
> awhile on the first syllable /tHu'-ga-t:er/?Miguel, I ask you again to answer to the question II
>
> (te:r in pate':r, being a heavy syllable too isn't it, as in
> dHuga'te:r too...)
> Marius