Re: Post-Postscript on Przeworsk

Informed people want to know.

Patrick

----- Original Message -----
From: "george knysh" <gknysh@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [tied] Re: Post-Postscript on Przeworsk


>
> --- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > There was the east-west trek, under
> > whichever
> > > > > > leaders.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Torsten
> > > > >
> > > > > GK: Are you still maintaining that:
> > > > >
> > > > > (1) "Germanic proper... developed from
> > Przeworsk"
> > > > > (2) "Przeworsk became the center of the
> > Germanic languages
> > > > > in our perspective."
> > > > > (3) "the Grimm-shift took place during
> > Przeworsk expansion
> > > > > into Germania" ?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes, on all three counts.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Torsten
> > >
> > > GK: Fine. Then explain why
> > >
> > > (1) Jastorf+Silesian Celts+Bornholm and other
> > > islanders+ Pomeranians (=Przeworsk) creates
> > > "Germanic",
> > The Germanic language family, that is.
> >
> > >WHILE
> > > (2) Jastorf+ Pomeranians+ Scandinavians (=Oksywie)
> > > DOES NOT, and
> > Para-Germanic?
>
> ****GK: What was the difference between "the Germanic
> language family" and "Para-Germanic"? In this case
> between the Lugian/Vandilic and Gothic groups? What
> was the reason for the difference?****
> > >
> > > (3) Jastorf+ Pomeranians+ Milohrad c.+ Scythian
> > > Thrakoids (=Zarubintsi) DOES NOT, and
> > >
> > > (4) Jastorf+ Pomeranians + Geto/Dacian c. (=
> > > Poeneshti-Lukashovka) DOES NOT.
> > >
> > > ****
> >
> > That's not really a problem.
> > Some ex-British colonies speak English, some don't.
> > Some ex-Roman colonies speak Romance, some don't.
> > If several heterogenous components come together
> > linguistically, the
> > end result is that one of the components is favored,
> > depending on
> > extra-linguistic circumstances.
>
>
> ****GK: Fine. Which component was favoured among the 4
> Latenized cultures mentioned above and why? Who played
> the role of the British and of the Romans within these
> four combinations? What was it about the "Przeworsk"
> combination which resulted in the "Germanic language
> family" while the "Oksywie" combination only yielded
> "Para-Germanic"? We'll get to the rest of your theory
> later. ****
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Looking for last minute shopping deals?
> Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
> http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
>