Re: Post-Postscript on Przeworsk

From: tgpedersen
Message: 55014
Date: 2008-03-11

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: george knysh
>
> ****GK: Fine. Then explain why
>
> (1) Jastorf+Silesian Celts+Bornholm and other
> islanders+ Pomeranians (=Przeworsk) creates
> "Germanic", WHILE
>
> (2) Jastorf+ Pomeranians+ Scandinavians (=Oksywie)
> DOES NOT, and
>
> (3) Jastorf+ Pomeranians+ Milohrad c.+ Scythian
> Thrakoids (=Zarubintsi) DOES NOT, and
>
> (4) Jastorf+ Pomeranians + Geto/Dacian c. (=
> Poeneshti-Lukashovka) DOES NOT.
>
> ****
> >
> ===========
> Mr. Knysh
>
> Does this mean you consider
> Jastorf cannot be the homeland of Germanic ?
>
> Arnaud
> ===============
>

No, my little friend, it means exactly THE OPPOSITE, which is apparent
from THE FACT that he is using CAPITAL LETTERS whenever he thinks I'm
contradicting this belief that he holds so firmly.


Torsten