From: tgpedersen
Message: 54996
Date: 2008-03-10
> > If you had taken the time to search the archives,You're right.
> > you would have found
> > with 'Gubin':
> >
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/50599
> >
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/50154
> > but in the reference
> >
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistory_of_Poland_(until_966)
> > the text I quote has been excised, with no comment
> > on the discussion page.
> >
> > In other words, that fatal variable in archaeology,
> > direction, has not
> > been settled. Some claim Gubin/Wetterau was settled
> > from Przeworsk,
> > not the other way around. Which makes one wonder,
> > what evidence does
> > Shchukin have of the direction of the
> > Przeworsk/Jastorf influence?
> >
> >
> >
> > Torsten
>
> ****GK: There is NO Przeworsk culture before the
> arrival of the Jastorf+"Gubin Jastorf"+Silesian
> Celts+Bornholmers+
> into the area of early "Przeworsk". That area was
> previously occupied by carriers of the Pomeranian
> culture. Most were either killed or pushed out, and
> the "weak" remnant absorbed. After some 50-60 years,
> when early Przeworsk was in place, some "Pomeranians"
> came back, and were also absorbed. So the direction,
> according to Dombrowska (whom Shchukin is reporting)
> is clearly west->east. It becomes east->west only some
> two centuries later,in the time of Ariovistus. I don't
> know what you mean by "Some claim Gubin/Wetterau was
> settled from Przeworsk"... If there is no X (Przeworsk)
> prior to the advent of Y(Gubin Yastorf), then Y
> clearly is not the result of X.****