Re: Re[3]: [tied] Mille (thousand)

From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 54961
Date: 2008-03-10

----- Original Message -----
From: Brian M. Scott

Happens all the time in ordinary speech: for <cat> a single
speaker may say [kæt], [kæ?t], or [kæ?] and never notice
that the [t] has disappeared completely from the last. A
speaker very likely won't notice that <wouldn't> ['wUdnt]
has become [wUnt]. And so on.

Brian

==============
None of your examples is a morpheme
nor an initial phoneme.
It's just colloquialisms.
Hence they are irrelevant
when it comes to #s-
which is both initial and morphemic.

Arnaud

========================