From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 54962
Date: 2008-03-10
----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Ryan
There is no *ka? meaning 'one' or *t?_m? meaning 'two',
or anything derived from it,
in any language anywhere at any time.
Patrick
=======================
Issueing a big pronouncement again ?
Latin : cae-lebs "alone-lifer"
from *ka?(i)
Be it true Latin or not,
it has the right morpheme.
Hebrew t°?om-i "twin"
Twins go by two, right ?
from
*ta?om? "two".
with final stress on nisbe -i-
Big pronouncement kaputt.
Arnaud
=============