From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
Message: 54538
Date: 2008-03-03
>----- Original Message -----No he doesn't. He lists as one of many "Nominalbildungen"
>From: "Miguel Carrasquer Vidal" <miguelc@...>
>> *dheh1i- is "to suck". The verbal root that has been
>> discussed here all along is *dheh1-. What matters in the
>> case of baidýti is what the root means in Balto-Slavic. LIV
>> gives the following Balto-Slavic meanings: "legen; hinlegen;
>> setzen; (Eier) legen; anlöten; machen; tun; sagen;
>> sprechen".
>>
>> >Perhaps Sergei will change your mind on its verbal nature?
>>
>> Sergei just confirmed my earlier guess that the formation
>> (baidýti) is denominal.
>>
>***
>
>I guess you do not trust Pokorny who lists *dhi- as an extended form of
>*dhe:-.
>Pokorny list 'suck' as *dhe:(i)-; I guess you do not believe him on thatYes I do, see above: *dheh1i-
>either.
>Denominal? Does that mean that the first element is nominal: *bhoi-?The first element is the root of the noun bai~das.