Re[8]: [tied] Re: Finnish KASKA

At 2:37:50 PM on Thursday, February 28, 2008, fournet.arnaud
wrote:

>> But neither of these interpretations contradicts what I
>> wrote or justifies your 'I disagree', and the fact
>> remains that similar phonological developments are *not*
>> a prerequisite for common ancestry.

> This lengthy argumentation tries to demonstrate that
> Basque and Etruscan about 700 km away from one another and
> sharing about everything when it comes to phonological
> rules are to be considered *not* from a common ancestry.

No, it doesn't. If that's what you got out of it, you
really need to read it again, from the beginning, because
you plainly didn't understand a word that I wrote.

> Foutaise.

Fíflska.

Brian