From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 54076
Date: 2008-02-24
> >I think that is actually to be read as: "It's the most economicalMiguel
> >explanation because there is no trace in IE of an inherited
> >"passive" category", since you provide no other reason why that
> >assumption is the most economical. Please object if you think
> >otherwise.
>===========
> I didn't think spelling out the reason was necessary.
> Torsten