From: Rick McCallister
Message: 53759
Date: 2008-02-20
>____________________________________________________________________________________
> This is the first time I hear of umlaut though. I
> frankly don't think
> it is possible to increase the economy of
> interpretation by this
> invention. Finnic also went the other way *kektä or
> *käktä became
> Finnish kaksi '2' for example. Nobody knows why. But
> Indo-
> Europeanists would know that numerals are tricky.
>
> Jouppe
> ============
>
> Two was *kukt-
> and the -i- is a later addition of Finnish
> after *kukt bacame *kakt
> in Western Uralic.
>
> Mordvin is kafta and kawto
> with no -i-.
> Data are stubborn...
>
> And this root for number two
> has a strange look-alike
> with word "four" kwetw(er)
> A kind of reduplication
> ku-kwt-
>
> Arnaud
> =============
>
>
>