From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 53761
Date: 2008-02-20
> --- "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>I initially read Arnaud's statement the same way you did,
> wrote:
>>> The list of words I presented: appi, jousi, kalki, koski
>>> and kusi are not reconstructions but real words in a
>>> real language. They also constitute solid counter
>>> evidence to your 'fallen-out-of-the-sky' umlaut
>>> hypothesis. Where did it come from?
>> I'm afraid you are unaware that Finnish is *not* Uralic
> So, if Finnish is not Uralic, what is it?