From: jouppe
Message: 53457
Date: 2008-02-17
--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@...> wrote:
>
> At 1:32:27 AM on Tuesday, February 12, 2008, Patrick Ryan
> wrote:
>
> > Not of much use in my opinion. Uralic contacts were
> > probably with IE dialect speakers not PIE speakers.
>
> > There is no PIE **c'næX as far as I know.
>
> He appears to have his own notation for PIE phonemes. This
> *c'næX- seems to be an error for *q'næX-, which would be his
> version of *gWneh2-.
>
> > The same for *c'nh-(i)e/o-, 'man'.
>
> His version of *g^nh1-(i)e/o-.
>
> Brian
>