From: tgpedersen
Message: 51560
Date: 2008-01-20
> some of Holzer's TemematicWhat semantics would it have? Semantics-less morphemes are suspect.
> words have strange Noreen alternations in Germanic too, ie.
> PIE pork^o- vs. Du. varken, Ger. Verkel, Gothic barg-s "pig"
>
> Torsten
>
> =============
> I have made the hypothesis that PIE had a nasal prefix,
> most probably #m- (as in PAA) (unprovable because of assimilation)
> this could be the explanation.
> In that case bridd could be good Germanic out of *m-pet-ro >What's with the t > dh? And how would you explain the /k/ of th Du.,
> *bhedhro.
> I didn't know about these Noreen alternations,Several authors mention the phenomenon, but without a name, so I made