From: Rick McCallister
Message: 51255
Date: 2008-01-14
> Mr. Knysh____________________________________________________________________________________
> you are a strange "historian"
> if I understood well your job.
>
> Your "proof" is that the hypothesis
> that Etruscans might have come from somewhere else
> is true as of right now
> because it might happen in the future to be proved
> right.
> I'm sorry
> I don't believe in promises
> I thought history was a serious science dealing with
> facts.
> Alleging an article in a newspaper doesn't sound
> serious at all.
>
> So far you have not answered my questions :
>
> The major problem for any theory that makes
> Etruscans arrive from somewhere else is teleology.
> People with a known capacity of moving somewhere
> else : PIE, Vikings, English, Romans, Greeks. All
> these people settled in *many* places : They did not
> move from place A to place B. They scattered from
> place A to places B C D etc.
> So the problem with the non-autochtonous theory is
> at least four-fold :
> - where from ?
> - when did they move ?
> - why is it we have no traces of Etruscans somewhere
> else ?
> - why is it Etruscans precisely chose only Etruria,
> when they had plenty of places to choose from (Cf
> Phoenicians)
>
> I am still waiting for something more that a fuzzy
> article in NYT.
>
> Arnaud
>
>