Re: swallow vs. nightingale, correction

> > Giving it too much credence (or treating it as an argument for
> > anything else) is a serious methodological mistake.
>
> No. But proposing a theory which calls some phenomena 'irregular' is.

Imagine a cancer researcher who proposes a theory that some cell
changes are 'irregular'. He would get no funding (hopefully).
Everyone would see him for what he was: arrogant and intellectually
lazy.


Torsten