Re: [tied] Re: -leben/-lev/-löv and -ung-

From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 50815
Date: 2007-12-09

 
----- Original Message -----
From: tgpedersen
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2007 4:30 PM
Subject: [Courrier indésirable] [tied] Re: -leben/-lev/-löv and -ung-

--- In cybalist@... s.com, "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@ ...>
wrote:
>
> What about good old PIE :
> Germanic *lauha meadow, uninhabited place
> Lituanian *laukas
> Sanscrit *loka
That becomes German -loh, Dutch -loo, English -lea etc, not documented
in Scandinavia. There is an extensive literature on the
-leben/-lev/ -löv you might want to read.

> This L_w unsuffixed looks like a PIE word.
Which?

Torsten
============

A.F

I write more explicitly :
I am not saying lev, löv, leben is Germanic
I believe that lev, löv, leben are just the unsuffixed variant of *low-ko :
hence *low,
It might just be a western PIE language (like say Celtic) which gave these words to Germanic intruders. And in that language the word was not suffixed by -ko,
as in the other languages like Germanic or Lituanian.
Or it may also be Germanic : what is the reflex of *low-i for example ?
Arnaud
===============