From: meska_jd
Message: 50786
Date: 2007-12-09
>in
> On 2007-12-09 12:54, ualarauans wrote:
>
> > There's an article by Tomasz Czarnecki dealing with Gothic loans
> > Polish [http://www.fh.ug.gda.pl/images/Czarnecki.pdf%5d. He listsPolish
> > Gdan'sk and Torun' under the category of "möglicheEntlehnungsfälle"
> > (pp. 11-13). Now if these settlement names are indeed Gothic,they
> > must have survived the later Slavic colonization of what is nowPoland.
>seems
> I don't understand Czarnecki's suggestion concerning Torun' (there
> to be some kind of complex typo due to problems with fonts), soit's
> difficult to comment on it. The alleged Gothic prototype of thename of
> Gdan'sk is given first as "*gudiscandja", then (more correctly)*gutisks
> "*gutiskandja" (it would actually have been something like
> andeis in Wulfilan terms, from *Gutiskaz anDijaz). I'm verysceptical
> about the possibility of deriving anything like *gUdanIskU fromthat
> without shuffling the segments up in a way that strainscredibility.
> Other geographical names mentioned in the article include therivername
> Tanew. I used to believe myself that it looked liked a borrowingfrom
> Gothic, but see:let's
>
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/28324
>
> Not that I dismiss all that material. Many of those Gothic (well,
> say early (East) Germanic) sources are fully plausible.
>
> Piotr
>