From: tgpedersen
Message: 50731
Date: 2007-12-07
>According to the Wikipedia article, some disagree:
> At 5:58:57 AM on Thursday, December 6, 2007, tgpedersen
> wrote:
>
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Rick McCallister
> > <gabaroo6958@> wrote:
>
> >> So, any relation to George? The one from Wassa's ton?
>
> > Hard to say.
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington%2C_Tyne_and_Wear
>
> > This article roots for *hwæs- but doesn't document the h-;
> > instead it cites a Wasindone from 1096.
>
> The <Washington> in Tyne and Wear is 'the estate called
> after Hwæssa', from OE <Hwæssingtûn>. Forms:
>
> Wessint', Wessinton ~1170x80
> Wessington('),-yng- 1183[~1320], 1196x1215-1473
> Wesshyngton, -yng- 1411-1556
>
> Wassinton' 1211
> Wassington, -yng- 1382, 1418
> Wasshin(g)ton 1406
> Washington 1581-
>
> Quessigton' 1280
> Quessigton' ~1310
> Whessyngton 1475, 1548
> Qwassyngton 1388x1406
> Whassington, -yng- 1350-70
>
> It's the third group that shows that the base anthroponym
> must have been <Hwæssa> rather than <Wassa> (see below).
> Victor Watts notes that the first two groups seem to have
> been influenced by OE <wæsse> 'a wet place, a swamp, a
> marsh', which however does not at all fit the topography.
> The name <Hwæssa> is also seen in <Whessoe> (Durham).Odd. Especially since the the forms without k- or h- are the oldest.
> The <Washington> in West Sussex is 'the settlement of theThere is a Vassingerød in North Sjælland. That Wassa dude sure gets
> Wassingas, the people called after Wassa', from OE
> <Wassingatûn>. Forms:
>
> Wessingatun 946x7[12th c.]
> (æt) Wassingatune, Wasingatun 947[13th c.]
> (æt) Wasingatune 963[13th c.]
> Wassingatune before 1080
> Wasingetune 1086
> Wassington 1261-1439
> Washington 1397
>