From: tgpedersen
Message: 50542
Date: 2007-11-20
> 5. "Lark". OE la:verce points at Gmc. *laiwVrk- which is alsoLarks ascend, so:
> proved by Finnish leivonen. The Latin < Celtic form alauda may, or
> may not, belong here. If it is related, why we have a- not in
> Germanic here, like in the previous example? And two questions
> remain: a) is the Finnish form isolated within the Uralic family,
> and then we should suppose it was borrowed from Germanic, or
> contrary, it is not isolated, and may have been the source for
> Gmc., and b) if the word is Semitic, which are its cognetes?